منابع مشابه
Tense as Discourse Anaphor
In this paper, I consider a range of English expressions and show that their context-dependency can be characterized in terms of two properties: 1. they specify entities in an evolving model of the discourse that the listener is constructing; 2. the particular entity specified depends on another entity in that part of the evolving 'discourse model' that the listener is currently attending to. S...
متن کاملPRO, the EPP and Nominative Case: Evidence from Irish Infinitivals
Recent work in the Minimalist Program has made use of the Extended Projection Principle as a licensing feature for subject nominals explicitly separate from abstract nominative Case (Chomsky 1995). Both features are checked in Chomsky's system by the Tense head. Chomsky adopts the case system for licensing PRO proposed in Chomsky and Lasnik 1993, whereby PRO receives null case from an appropria...
متن کاملPRO, the EPP and Nominative Case: Evidence from Irish Infinitivals
Recent work in the Minimalist Program has made use of the Extended Projection Principle as a licensing feature for subject nominals explicitly separate from abstract nominative Case (Chomsky 1995). Both features are checked in Chomsky's system by the Tense head. Chomsky adopts the case system for licensing PRO proposed in Chomsky and Lasnik 1993, whereby PRO receives null case from an appropria...
متن کاملSuccessive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking
In recent literature, a debate has arisen between two theories of the calculation and realization of morphological case. The more commonly held theory, the Agree model, states that all Case-features on nominals are valued by nearby functional heads. Given a designated case-assigning functional head F0 and a nominal α that is c-commanded by F0, the case-marking associated with F0 will be assigne...
متن کاملConstraints on anaphor movement
2. Fronting pattern follows from three ranked, violable constraints: Antecedent: An anaphor has an accessible antecedent, i.e. an anaphor has an antecedent and the anaphor does not precede and c-command its antecedent (Hankamer and Sag, 1976). >> TopFirst: Topic is clause initial, i.e. if a syntactic constituent is topic it is clause initial (= in Spec-CP; cf. Costa 2001:176). >> SubjFirst: Sub...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ENGLISH LINGUISTICS
سال: 2003
ISSN: 0918-3701,1884-3107
DOI: 10.9793/elsj1984.20.143